Unobtanium_Alloy t1_j7egij1 wrote
Reply to comment by superjudgebunny in What weak signals or drivers of change—that receive limited attention today—are most likely to create signifiant impacts over the next 10-20 years? Where are the black swans hiding? by NewDiscourse
That's like arguing any profession which requires you to understand basic math shouldn't "need" (be allowed to) use a calculator, since they already understand how to do it themselves.
I don't find your arguments convincing.
superjudgebunny t1_j7ehnls wrote
Right, but you already own a calculator. We used them in construction all the time. It’s a phone. Most of the things AR would bring are already in my phone. I would have to probably stop, get out a device to control my AR and input commands. Might as well just use my phone.
Which I should have brought up. Redundancy doesn’t make something good. If devices are already in public control. What EXTRA features does AR bring?
My argument assumes that one already has access to things in which we now consider basic technology. AR has to offer something that isn’t already in a professionals portfolio of instruments. What new does it bring to the table that would change things?
If you can’t give me examples, this is a one sided discussion. This tells me you have no arguments as a proponent of AR tek.
I’ve stated it has niche applications sure. Not enough to get the funding and research to make it public or mainstream.
Low-Restaurant3504 t1_j7ewb69 wrote
You got alot of weird, made up rules and stipulations you keep running to. Just an observation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments