Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Yweain t1_j8rm3jy wrote

That’s normal numbers though. Usual unemployment rate in the world is around 6%. It was a bit lower before pandemic (5.4%), increased in 2020 to 6.6%, fallen sharply in the next 2 years and projected to rise a bit in 2023 to 5.8%.

23

BroodPlatypus t1_j8rwfnq wrote

But this frames it as a single number so this sub will love to see how fucked the world is with it’s still positive job growth.

8

Rich_Hedberg t1_j8ubzal wrote

This headline is definitely playing off the fact people would assume it's maybe US or EU or something. Headlines like this infuriate me- communicating information is important but like everything else in our society the spirit of it has been stripped of value and optimized only to generate revenue, in this case in the form of engagement.

1

Tall-_-Guy t1_j8rlg8h wrote

With the advent of more and more intelligent AIs that will enable us to automate more and more jobs, something will have to give. I could see the argument for a UBI that comes from a corporate profits tax rather than a payroll tax.

I know it's a touchy subject, but we really need to think about and address family planning for the futures sake. Ostensibly there are too many people and not enough resources currently. AI and tech may alleviate the crunch, but with the politicians we have, we're more likely to get terminator than a utopia.

18

ToothlessGrandma t1_j8s2ect wrote

The good news is if you're unemployed it's your problem. When everyone is unemployed it's the governments problem.

If the officials in charge would like the country to not decend into chaos with them on the receiving end of the backlash, someone will figure out a solution.

I suspect it'll be a couple of years of them trying to ban AI which will never happen and it'll be a waste of time and resources, and then something will actually give.

6

Tall-_-Guy t1_j8s32b1 wrote

Not to be grim, but a bullet is cheaper than taking care of a lot of hungry people. I'm not political, but there has obviously been recent attempts to disrupt the election process. This would be an absolute nightmare and the masses would lose handily. Let's be honest, the American Govt doesn't care about any of us peons.

6

Psychomadeye t1_j8tge3e wrote

It'll be more expensive to fight everyone by a long stretch. It's literally cheaper to do nothing. Also, you can get about 25lb of flour for less than ten .308 rounds.

2

Tall-_-Guy t1_j8thuaa wrote

Ahahahahahahaha. Ahhh, I needed that laugh.

2

Psychomadeye t1_j8tpaqv wrote

I'm not sure where you are at but .308 cost about a dollar each here. Flour is about eight dollars for twenty five pounds. Assuming 200% accuracy and soldiers who fight for free with zero causalities, it would still have been cheaper to not fire those rounds and feed 37 people for the day. But if you do fire those rounds, you can make more by shooting other things as human flesh might not net you as much in the food market.

1

Tall-_-Guy t1_j8tvvtf wrote

You think they'd use bullets. Hahaha. Plus feeding a person for the rest of their life. Now multiply that by millions and they'll have children too. It's unsustainable. Dead is cheaper in the long run.

1

Psychomadeye t1_j8tx0ix wrote

You think they'll suddenly grow foresight? I was fucking with you but now I'm kinda worried you think there's direction to any of this.

2

MagicManTX84 t1_j8tb77g wrote

In the world? With over 8 billion people that’s a really small number! Qualify it.

3

Ok-Cartoonist5349 OP t1_j8rjz2l wrote

And the main consequence, according to their report is that more and more workers will be forced to accept lower quality jobs... So while many were super happy to say and believe that the power balance shifted from companies to workers, this suggests otherwise.

Will we keep on seeing union membership increasing for instance? I know this is a trend in the US but it seems to be the case in other countries such as France that has seen a rise in union membership since the beginning of the year.

1

Salahuddin315 t1_j8rlejc wrote

200million is less than 3 percent of the global population, well within normal levels.

8

ToothlessGrandma t1_j8s34e2 wrote

But it's roughly nearly the entire population of the US. Imagine if 200 million people here lost their jobs.

I know you're trying to make those numbers sound less scary, but it helps to have perspective on both sides.

−10

treddit44 t1_j8s4c5c wrote

It's 2.5% of the world population and roughly 4.5% of the working population. Just wanted to ballpark some numbers

4

FuturologyBot t1_j8ro5lb wrote

The following submission statement was provided by /u/Ok-Cartoonist5349:


And the main consequence, according to their report is that more and more workers will be forced to accept lower quality jobs... So while many were super happy to say and believe that the power balance shifted from companies to workers, this suggests otherwise.

Will we keep on seeing union membership increasing for instance? I know this is a trend in the US but it seems to be the case in other countries such as France that has seen a rise in union membership since the beginning of the year.


Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/113qerj/208_million_people_will_be_unemployed_in_2023_or/j8rjz2l/

1

Anal_Forklift t1_j8smaxi wrote

ILO is left wing political group, not a professional research institution. What is with this sub turning into r/politics with constant doomerism?

1

In-Cod-We-Thrust t1_j8t8u7z wrote

Cool, do I have to sign up, or will it be like a lottery type thing…

1

WWJPD t1_j904adz wrote

This whole article is fucking stupid. Nothing special in it. Clickbait.

1

NoSoupForYouRuskie t1_j90cg12 wrote

And yet here I am. Still working. Still selling everyone products and there never seems to be a dip in people buying them. I mean we were all on lockdown and it was the most profitable year my store had seen. Ever. Everyone had record breaking profits even with no products in stock. The government never wants us to recover

1

MegaCornPop t1_j8u4k76 wrote

Well...it's like this, 7 billion people gotta go. You are non essential worthless eaters. Klaus Schwab said so.

0