Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

XueShiLong t1_jaa2m0f wrote

no one who actively seeks power over others should be given power over others

18

StarChild413 t1_jaagjrs wrote

And without an infinite regress of people forced into service to others how do you check the corruption of the people in power-behind-the-throne holding the ability to force others into power

5

Rofel_Wodring t1_jacw64k wrote

Random selection from the citizenry.

Such an idea is anathema to Enlightenment liberalism. 'But what if we make a homeless bum God-king bluh bluh bluh'.

But look: if you idiots were any good at designing a society then randomly selecting some schlub and getting a philosopher king only slightly less competent than a certified genius should be peanuts. It's been several centuries of Enlightenment liberalism's hegemony and they have only gotten more smug about their lack of ability to uplift society's lowest.

2

AFutureBrighter t1_jabc5a9 wrote

Elected office is “supposed to be” about serviceD not power. Just as an aside

−1