Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

irishnewf86 t1_iwtjogl wrote

Reply to comment by FlexasState in I'm John Swierk, assistant professor of Chemistry at Binghamton University, State University of New York. My team and I are working to understand the molecular composition of tattoo inks to provide a broader understanding to artists and consumers. AMA! by intengineering

if you want to avoid carcinogenic ink, try avoiding getting it injected into you. Can't imagine how anyone would think ink would be benign after being injected into living tissue.

−34

D4bbled_In_P4cifism t1_iwtl4ls wrote

Really? You gotta be that guy?

20

irishnewf86 t1_iwxssw8 wrote

the tattoo community is really touchy, lol

0

[deleted] t1_iwxxijc wrote

[deleted]

1

irishnewf86 t1_iwzozd3 wrote

thanks for validating my comment :)

You were so triggered by a harmless comment that you had to make up a comment about my alleged "divisive" comment history!

The only posts of mine that have been massively downvoted are the ones where I point out that injecting a carcinogen into a living organ for narcissistic aesthetic purposes is a stupid thing to do.

But hey, if injecting printer ink into living cells is your thing, fill your boots, moron.

1

[deleted] t1_ix0adta wrote

[deleted]

1

irishnewf86 t1_ix1kcv2 wrote

shouldn't you be off getting printer ink injected into a living organ somewhere?

1

irishnewf86 t1_ix1kn25 wrote

better to follow r/hypertension than r/childtouchers

1