BillC318 t1_j9l01iz wrote
How can we ensure that state and school district leaders implement the science of reading well? And don’t just give it lip service and a 2 hour professional development session?
EdSourceToday OP t1_j9l1kkc wrote
In California, there is a list of approved curriculums, but it is outdated and tied to the Common Core standards, not whether it is based on the science of reading. Districts can choose whatever they want.
EdSourceToday OP t1_j9l1wem wrote
As I mentioned, the state is agnostic on curriculums. However, Gov. Newsom has proposed $ 1 million for a "Literacy Roadmap" to guide teachers and the school board. The bill expanding on it specifically mentions the science of reading and the five key elements of sound reading instruction. This will move the state closer to taking a clear and concise position on effective instruction. It will not be a mandate, however. We'll see what it looks like a year from now.
You can read our literacy coverage here: https://edsource.org/2022/californias-reading-dilemma/672845
BillC318 t1_j9lht46 wrote
Good to see the governor engaged in the issue as the moribund state education leadership is totally lost in a fog! If you know what I mean. Maybe it involves kickbacks from publishers. It wouldn’t be the first time!.
BillC318 t1_j9lix8k wrote
I read all of your well done coverage!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments