Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TemetNosce85 t1_iwkds9r wrote

Human traces art for years and "borrows" their techniques from other artists: "Yup, this is legitimate."

Ai does the same thing, but crappier: "Nooo, this is bad!! I can't make money off of Deviantart and Patreon for my furry porn!!"


lstn t1_iwnua7d wrote

I'm sure you'll say the same when AI starts making music instead of musicians.

It's less about the now, and more about the future. AI in art and design has it's uses for sure, but outright copying years of work (regardless of your comment, these people spend years perfecting their style and ability) is shit, but why would you care when you can make your own furry porn for free.


TemetNosce85 t1_iwnvzjg wrote

All I hear is "wah wah, piracy is destroying our life" just like what the RIAA and others do. Except, piracy not only spreads media awareness further, but its technological advancements actually build industries and challenges companies to do better. For instance, Apple Music and Spotify would most likely not have been created had it not been for piracy. Hell, we would not have FM radio and rock n' roll if it weren't for pirate radio in the 60s. And does piracy stop people from purchasing media? Of course not.


lstn t1_iwnxj94 wrote

Ok buddy


TemetNosce85 t1_iwnyyq7 wrote

Yeah, I thought so. You have no response. Michelangelo would not get mad about people using computers to make art, especially when you have access to "AI"-like tools on photoshop. So stop being angry about the future and imagining the worst will happen like a 5G Karen. Everything will be fine, it always is.


lstn t1_iwo1w4s wrote

I have no response because your argument is nonsensical in the context of my comment, I lost all interest. Have a good one.