Submitted by joke_channel t3_124im9f in Jokes
itzToreve t1_je0bfoz wrote
Didnt get it
unjadedview t1_je0g60g wrote
It was a trick to get her in bed.
The-Coolest-Of-Cats t1_je0gmv7 wrote
Same.. the frog doesn't do anything, but it also didn't help the guy score a girl?
LedgeEndDairy t1_je0h5wv wrote
Yes it did. He used the frog as an accessory to pique her interest into coming up to his place. The frog, being a frog, does nothing, so he stays in character saying he was going to show the frog one more time how to lick pussy.
I.e. The guy licks her pussy, which was his objective all along.
Torvite t1_je0jkud wrote
I wonder how many women exist that would jump at the idea of a frog performing cunnilingus on them (with a man supervising), but wouldn't want the man involved.
Heree_WeGo t1_je1o3ep wrote
Upvoted by human beings that have zero understanding of women and think that a woman would prefer to be eaten out by a frog than a man.
itzToreve t1_je0wzmo wrote
Nvm now i get it
The-Coolest-Of-Cats t1_je0k70m wrote
But there's literally no indication that the girl consented to him licking her instead, so I guess that's why it falls completely flat for me. If she's down for him to do that, then she was interested in him anyway, which also ruins the joke, so..
DarkHorseStoryTeller t1_je0ousz wrote
It can be presumed she let's the guy lick her first to show the frog.
LedgeEndDairy t1_je0r1hp wrote
It fails because of no implied consent? It's a joke.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments