Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

dbsgirl OP t1_isvzqd7 wrote

Reply to comment by wildadragon in LPT: When someone you know casually loses someone, read the obituary and comment on something specific. by dbsgirl

Hmm, that was largely why I included examples which were clearly not a templated list of survivors. And included the option of your own recollection of a story that you remembered. But by all means, be hateful that should work too.

−7

wildadragon t1_isw0grh wrote

If you had a story of your own recollection then you shouldn't need to read the obituary because your own personal story and feelings would mean more, but by all means be obtuse and clueless that should work too.

5

303elliott t1_isw2im4 wrote

Did you die and no one had anything good to say about you? I can't figure out why else you would act like such a toxic edge lord

−2

wildadragon t1_isw3gwb wrote

Did you not read the title? When someone you know casually loses someone. So your coworker who you know loses their aunt/uncle who you never knew what might you say about them?

Thanks for showing me how much of an ignorant edge lord you are.

3

303elliott t1_isw4hwe wrote

You're so incessant on inconsequential semantics you can't pull your head out of your ass to see the whole picture. I'm done talking to you.

−3

wildadragon t1_isw4qhn wrote

Always funny how when people are clearly wrong they complain others are using semantics when semantics are literally the meanings of the words used.

2

dbsgirl OP t1_isw1iyd wrote

Did you skip every other paragraph? I wrote in the post that if you have that knowledge then to use it and offered another option as well.

Being obtuse and clueless would be the option of not expressing any kind of empathy or condolences to someone you care about when they are experiencing grief - because you couldn't be bothered to take the 45 seconds it takes to read the obituary.

−7