Comments
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscddpl wrote
A very good addition, thank you.
That_Flippin_Rooster t1_isceweb wrote
I consider op-ed's the fanfiction of news sites.
YggdrasilsLeaf t1_iscc9j2 wrote
For once an actual useful tip!
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscdsoc wrote
I can only hope.
Dr_Edge_ATX t1_iscmk4r wrote
Same with any news show. If the host is giving you an opinion or "asking questions" then you aren't watching the news you're watching entertainment or propaganda.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscolmd wrote
The point of journalism is to ask questions, not to use their own opinion to answer them. Not everything is propaganda. Just because intent exists behind a question does not mean it's intent to deceive.
I suspect you are confusing entertainment television for news when you typed that.
lzytm t1_isdm4i9 wrote
Totally agree. Check sources people. Seriously.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdsrys wrote
You get it.
keepthetips t1_isc7vz7 wrote
Hello and welcome to r/LifeProTips!
Please help us decide if this post is a good fit for the subreddit by up or downvoting this comment.
If you think that this is great advice to improve your life, please upvote. If you think this doesn't help you in any way, please downvote. If you don't care, leave it for the others to decide.
Perused t1_iscuowm wrote
Same goes for some stations that have the word “news” in their name.
lifestop t1_isdnnos wrote
Yeah, only an idiot would think "news" means anything other than entertainment. /s
[deleted] t1_isdkepq wrote
[deleted]
Gorf_the_Magnificent t1_isdkkth wrote
Do you mean a news company or a News company?
Most news companies give their Op-Eds a fact checking that no social media outlet provides.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdub02 wrote
That's why I carefully used the word article.
snoobsnob t1_isdq2n0 wrote
You should approach any news article that way. Every news organization and reporter has a bias and is often trying to push a particular view or agenda. Read multiple sources, especially ones that go against your beliefs, and never take anything at face value.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdsnjo wrote
I think your idea of tabloid skepticism and mine are different.
I'll give you an idea. I don't read tabloids.
crazybaker42 t1_isdr0ma wrote
Depending on the source you or more or less correct. The bigger problem is people who have been sowing deliberate mistrust of legitimate news sources. Dictators, autocrats, and the extreme right love to do this. By getting people to distrust those who are telling the truth it makes people easier to manipulate.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdt16w wrote
That's why it's important to be able to identify the differences between a tabloid quality article/op-ed and a news article that's even worth investigating. We all only have so much time in the day, save yourself the trouble and skip the op-eds or lower quality.
Tabloids are essentially junk tv level of information.
DroolingSlothCarpet t1_iscpmyy wrote
An op-ed is not an article.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscryh3 wrote
r/confidentlyincorrect
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscpuhd wrote
#"Article: A piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication."
Fairly confident that statement is incorrect.
DroolingSlothCarpet t1_iscr68a wrote
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscrfkt wrote
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the word article bud.
DroolingSlothCarpet t1_iscrjpn wrote
bud?
We're done.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscroog wrote
Okay pal. Go look up article when you get a chance. Ttyl.
DroolingSlothCarpet t1_iscqkts wrote
It's an editorial. An opinion.
[deleted] t1_iscral4 wrote
[removed]
stiffneck84 t1_iscf8lb wrote
Example: news corp runs its Hunter Biden stories under the opinion header of the NYP.
Gemmabeta t1_iscd9dk wrote
Also, know the categories of opinions:
Editorials: opinion of the newspaper's establishment/editorial board itself (for example, the NYT's endorsement of person X for president will be published as an editorial). It may or may not have anything to do with the opinion of the owners/shareholders of the paper depending on the level of journalistic independence each publication can maintain.
Op-ed (opposite the editorials): opinions of people unaffiliated with the paper, but who were actively solicited by the newspaper to write (as salaried regular columnists or one off pieces). Which again, may or may not agree with the paper's "official line" depending on the level of dissent each editorial board tolerate or on the requirements by "fair time" laws.
Letters to the Editor: unsolicited opinions (generally from readers)--which are still nevertheless curated by the editors, you are are still unlikely to see the full range of opinions "in the wild."
Semi related are Advertorials: Which are paid advertisements dressed up to to look like an op-ed or a standard news piece. These only express the opinion of whomever bought the space.