Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

RicketyCricket t1_je9lp7z wrote

Mainly that Spock is much lighter weight and really focuses on just configuration management and stateful ness. Hydra has all these crazy bells and whistles (Ray integration etc) that could be useful for certain things but kinda starts meandering from the original purpose of configuration management imo. Hydra is great and if it works for you then use it. We built Spock internally when I was at Fidelity because Hydra didn’t exist… just so happens that FB/Meta was doing the same thing at the same time so both libraries end up covering a very similar usage space

1

_Arsenie_Boca_ t1_je9n0ea wrote

Thanks, I basically use only the config part of hydra and am regularly annoyed that its so clunky, so spock might be a good alternative. Gonna check it out :)

1