Submitted by No_Draft4778 t3_11rmgzs in MachineLearning
Alimbiquated t1_jcd2z4g wrote
Reply to comment by harharveryfunny in Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language [R] by No_Draft4778
I agree that comparing these learning processes to brains is bogus.
There is a general tendency to assume that if something seems intelligent, it must be like a human brain. It's like assuming that because it's fast, a car must have legs like a horse and eat oats.
Necessary-Meringue-1 t1_jcm6j79 wrote
>There is a general tendency to assume that if something seems intelligent, it must be like a human brain. It's like assuming that because it's fast, a car must have legs like a horse and eat oats.
Ironic, because that is literally what that article is doing.
Alimbiquated t1_jcmi1fd wrote
Right, it makes no sense.
Necessary-Meringue-1 t1_jcmjqhm wrote
I don't understand why it's so hard for people to acknowledge that LLMs deliver extremely impressive results, but that does not mean they have human-like intelligence of language understanding.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments