Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_irc5eys wrote

Reply to comment by master3243 in [R] Discovering Faster Matrix Multiplication Algorithms With Reinforcement Learning by EducationalCicada

[removed]

0

master3243 t1_irc6to3 wrote

I literally cannot tell if your joking or not!

If I release an algorithm that beats SOTA along with a full and complete proof would I also need to attach all my notes and different intuitions that made me take the decisions I took???????

I can 100% tell you've never worked on publishing improvements to algorithms or math proofs because NO ONE DOES THAT. All they need is 1-the theorem/algorithm and 2-Proof that it's correct/beats SOTA

2

ReginaldIII t1_irc7nt0 wrote

I'm done.

You only care about the contribution to matmul. Fine.

There's a much bigger contribution to RL being used to solve these types of problems (wider than just matmul). But fine.

Goodbye.

1

master3243 t1_irdoyzz wrote

> You only care about the contribution to matmul

False, which is why I said it would have been better if they released everything. I definitely personally care more about the model/code/training process than the matmul result.

However, people are not 1 dimensional thinkers, I can simultaneously say that deepmind should release all their recourses AND at the same time say that this work is worthy of a nature publication and aren't missing any critical requirements.

2