Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

xrailgun t1_ira22vy wrote

Reply to comment by ECEngineeringBE in [R] Google announces Imagen Video, a model that generates videos from text by Erosis

Shit straw man take.

14

ECEngineeringBE t1_irac32j wrote

How so?

I could say the same about that "shit gatekeeping take"

1

xrailgun t1_irc7qic wrote

In case you're serious, physics papers are crammed full of mathematical derivation first to logically support their hypotheses, then include all relevant conditions and parameters such that IF/WHEN you get access to the collider, key in the same, you could replicate them.

In ML, mathematical support still exists to varying degrees, but without sharing the source code, even if you had access to Google's/OpenAI's/Nvidia's billion dollar hardware, you can't replicate it.

2

eposnix t1_ircvtgw wrote

Wait, what? I mean, maybe not 100%, but there are metric fuckloads of open source implementations of closed source models replicated by just the method in the paper.

1