Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

zulu02 t1_isxv0b2 wrote

I am not sure if I understand you correctly, but do you one-hot encode the categorical data or how do you represent it?

1

yagami_light_1210 OP t1_isxvrza wrote

I have represented them as categorical variables only.i haven't coded them.

2

fist0fgod t1_isxv2dp wrote

I am a complete beginner but I would recommend looking at some more advanced methods like random forests or SVM's which may perform better. They may not but either way it will teach you a lot about the subject as I think you are just starting out?

1

yagami_light_1210 OP t1_isxwdqh wrote

I am not just starting out. I do know about random forest and SVM's. And have used random forest on the dataset, but didn't do much help.

I always believed that simple things would be much better in times when compared with complex things. And I use the same in my life, trading, and anywhere.

So I went through this, minimal method of doing logistic regression accompanied with interactions. Even though chi squares values and respective p values are significant with interactions. The interaction isn't helping me improving the metric. The probabilities for outcome as one is less than 50 for all the test instances.

1