> Award quality: Technically flawless paper with groundbreaking impact on one or more areas of AI, with exceptionally strong evaluation, reproducibility, and resources, and no unaddressed ethical considerations. Top 2% of accepted papers.

> Very Strong Accept: Technically flawless paper with groundbreaking impact on at least one area of AI or excellent impact on multiple areas of AI, with flawless quality, reproducibility, resources, and no unaddressed ethical considerations. Top 15% of accepted papers.

> Strong Accept: Technically strong paper with, with novel ideas, high impact on at least one area of AI, with excellent quality, reproducibility, resources, and no unaddressed ethical considerations. Top 30% of accepted papers.

> Accept: Technically solid paper, with high impact on at least one sub-area of AI or modest-to-high impact on more than one area of AI, with good to excellent quality, reproducibility, and if applicable, resources, and no unaddressed ethical considerations. Top 60% of accepted papers.

> Weak Accept: Technically solid, modest-to-high impact paper, with no major concerns with respect to quality, reproducibility, and if applicable, resources, ethical considerations.

> Borderline accept: Technically solid paper where reasons to accept, e.g., good novelty, outweigh reasons to reject, e.g., fair quality. Please use sparingly.

> Borderline reject: Technically solid paper where reasons to reject, e.g., poor novelty, outweigh reasons to accept, e.g. good quality. Please use sparingly.

> Reject: For instance, a paper with poor quality, inadequate reproducibility, incompletely addressed ethical considerations.

> Strong Reject: For instance, a paper with poor quality, limited impact, poor reproducibility, mostly unaddressed ethical considerations.

> Very Strong Reject: For instance, a paper with trivial results, limited novelty, poor impact, or unaddressed ethical considerations.

No communication among reviewers