Submitted by Signal-Mixture-4046 t3_ykbp1s in MachineLearning
fastglow t1_iusllds wrote
I see it mainly as one of my responsibilities as a researcher: I submit papers, so I should also review papers. If not us, then who?
But I think it does benefit me in that I have gotten better at distinguishing good research ideas from bad ones, and good experimental protocols from bad ones, good reporting from bad reporting, etc.
Proud_Ad_5895 t1_iuszsmc wrote
>If not us, then who?
The people harvesting the profits should ideally be the ones doing the work!
DeepGamingAI t1_iut3xdc wrote
All of the profits, none of the work. How do they get away with this model?
fastglow t1_iutk2xp wrote
Marx answered this like 150 years ago.
Proud_Ad_5895 t1_iut6jvp wrote
Internalized serfdom.
[deleted] t1_iutjqj6 wrote
[deleted]
Mefaso t1_iuva45y wrote
>The people harvesting the profits should ideally be the ones doing the work!
Conferences are all nonprofits
PeedLearning t1_iuwdj73 wrote
[citation needed]
Some are non-profit, but for example most of the IEEE conferences are for-profit... Another common theme is conference non-profits subcontracting a lot of organizational aspects to for-profits.
Mefaso t1_iuymntw wrote
IEEE is also a nonprofit
> Another common theme is conference non-profits subcontracting a lot of organizational aspects to for-profits.
That is true, but it's also a lot of work to organize a conference
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments