Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DeepGamingAI t1_iuv83lt wrote

>It's about enabling good scholarship and guiding researchers.

You just described the role of a discriminator in a gan

​

>uneducated and unqualified reviewers

op got an invite because they published there before, its on merit not a random review request. besides, the question solely focuses on how reviewing benefits the reviewer, it doesnt seem to cover the whole picture surrounding peer review system

4

curiousshortguy t1_iuvswa7 wrote

>You just described the role of a discriminator in a gan

I disagree. The discriminator is just used in a binary fashion and doesn't add a lot of explanatory value.

​

Just to clarify, I am not trying to say that OP is unqualified. But I think just thinking about it in a binary way isn't enough for good peer review and a functioning system.

1

rustyryan t1_ivx9why wrote

The critic provides gradients to the generator, which indicate what aspects of its generation led to the classification.

1