master3243 t1_iuzrd2n wrote
Reply to comment by yaosio in [D] DALL·E to be made available as API, OpenAI to give users full ownership rights to generated images by TiredOldCrow
> In the US AI created art can't be covered by copyright
What? Literally the answer was one google search away
Kashtanova obtained a US copyright on the art compiled into 18-pages which was created by Midjourney
Sources:
Artist receives first known US copyright registration for latent diffusion AI art
yaosio t1_iv0xirt wrote
This is what I found. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ai+created+art+can+not+be+copywritten
mgostIH t1_iv1fosb wrote
If you'd look at any of the articles before stopping to the title you'd understand that's what referred to "AIs work can't be copywritten" is that you can't attribute copyright to the artificial intelligence itself, but all of these judgements allow any human that puts any minimal effort into the generation (for example typing the prompt) to own the copyright for the image instead.
yaosio t1_iv1krc6 wrote
>The U.S. Copyright Office (USCO) once again rejected a copyright request for an A.I.-generated work of art, the Verge’s Adi Robertson reported last month. A three-person board reviewed a request from Stephen Thaler to reconsider the office’s 2019 ruling, which found his A.I.-created image “lacks the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim.”
AI created work can not be copywritten because a human must author it. If you want to copyright AI created work then you'll need to get the laws changed.
mgostIH t1_iv1mz53 wrote
The act of prompting the AI for the generation of the image is what grants you authorship of the latter.
master3243 t1_iv2h0c5 wrote
How did you literally just ignore the two articles above that show the US copyright office granting the copyright?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments