Submitted by errohan400 t3_yyvlyz in MachineLearning
Today is AAAI acceptance notification day. Please feel free to discuss the outcome.
Submitted by errohan400 t3_yyvlyz in MachineLearning
Today is AAAI acceptance notification day. Please feel free to discuss the outcome.
Very torturous. Do you know when you will be notified?
What is wrong with AAAI? My friend was a reviewer and I heard from him that all the reviewer have submitted their final verdict 2 weeks back.
Maybe it is postponed like last year and they cut off a lot of good papers on the last day.
It's out....and cmt is also available
Is it possible that AC suggests an acceptance and even then it gets rejected?
Accept / Weak Accept/ Borderline Accept => Final decision: Reject. Haha.
My paper was rejected. Today I received the same reviews as the last time and the meta review based on the only reject score which was totally far from the point of the paper. I guess this means there was no discussion between reviewers and the meta just looked at the worst rev
Good job AAAI
quite frequent
My paper was accepted! Scores: Accept/ Weak Accept/ Weak Accept/ Borderline Accept
My paper got accept! Score: accept, accept, weak accept, weak accept
7 5 5 5 Accept :)
7 6 6 6 -> 1 Accept / 3 Weak Accepts => Rejected 🥲
Then who takes the final decision?
We managed to turn around an Accept / Weak accept / 2*borderline rejects into Accept / 2 * weak accept / borderline accept and get accepted.
Another paper was Accept / Weak accept / 2 * Reject and turned into Accept / 2 * weak accept / Reject and got rejected. Too bad there was really a reviewer with incessant despise/misunderstanding of the paper. But we will find better venues, no worries there.
SAC, PC and so on.
I received the same reviews with the same scores, what does it mean?
On a slightly unrelated note, is there a virtual component of AAAI-23 and is it compulsory for authors to present their paper in person?
The Visa waiting times are way too long for my country (more than a year) since the conference is happening in USA and I'm not sure if I'll be able to get a VISA on time for the conference
[deleted]
This is pretty normal. They don't just do a majority vote of what the reviewers say. There are several other steps of the review process before a decision is made.
Naive comment
8, 7, 6, 4 -> Accept. Non-learning ("real" AI) track
feel sorry for you. We have accept / weak accept / weak accept and fortunately get accepted…
I'm sure they will allow you to upload a video or even zoom in if your paper is selected as an oral. It happened before the pandemic. But I wouldn't expect too much virtual "conference attendence experience", like virtual poster session on gather town, for this year.
Thanks! How do you know if your paper is selected as an oral?
Also, if it is selected just as a poster then there is no need to present the paper in the conference?
In the notification email, it was stated that the authors will be communicated their mode of presentation after December 1 deadline for submission of the camera ready version.
For poster presentations, most likely no need. But you should check with the conference organizer and will almost definitely need to pay the full registration fee.
Do you mean there is an explicit acceptance statement in the meta-review, but the paper status is Reject?
[deleted]
Most decisions are straightforward. But the borderline cases involves hundreds of meta reviewers, and dozen of senior meta reviewers, hundreds of late and emergency reviewers, all giving their time for free.
Thanks!
Yes, that was what happened to one of our papers :(
it happened to my paper as well. Do not understand.
I got an email about uploading the preprint by December 1. However, I don't see any form to upload that yet in CMT. I am wondering if this is peculiar or general.
Same here. Is it because the upload link is not yet at CMT? Anybody knows anything about it?
The link is up now.
Indeed, thanks.
[deleted] t1_iwx4iy6 wrote
[deleted]