Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Outside-Fun-4954 t1_ixaeo4j wrote

76825

Got 2 I think I have no chance :(

4

von_oldmann OP t1_ixax12x wrote

2 might be an outlier considering your other scores! Not really sure how this could happen. But I hope it pans out for you

3

lameheavy t1_ixaz4r9 wrote

I'm in a very similar situation myself. I'm not very hopeful that I can change their mind with a rebuttal. Gonna try and hope the meta-reviewer realizes how much that reviewer missed the mark. I hope AISTATS is still small enough for that much attention to detail (I know it's not just let me cope).

1

no_user_pro_user t1_ixaq919 wrote

New to this, no idea what it means when a reviewer misses to review - any guidance ?

4

No-Connection4924 t1_ixbz047 wrote

We got 6,6,6,6,6,4,7, any chance?

4

veejarAmrev t1_ixbzta2 wrote

and they say there is a shortage of reviewers

2

No-Connection4924 t1_ixc5vti wrote

This is Indeed strange. How does sisters decide how many reviews for one paper?

1

maybelator t1_ixc8iei wrote

I think a meta reviewer fucked up. Maybe to eager on emergency reviews?

1

the_universe_is_vast t1_ixeb66h wrote

  1. All confidence 4. The 5 has a very short review and seems to have misunderstood the paper.
4

lameheavy t1_ixsyiic wrote

You’re good. Address the comments on the 5 and it’s 100%…honestly even with out that you’re fine

2

Trying-to-buildpc t1_ixbh3ow wrote

4 7 6 3 9 with confidence 2 3 3 2 4.

Holy this is the reviews with largest range and variance that I got. A nice rebuttal might save my ass.

3

veejarAmrev t1_ixbowi1 wrote

Well, your two lowest scores also come with the lowest confidence. I think you've nothing to worry about.

3

brucebay t1_ixbulhv wrote

Good luck to everybody for the next steps.

How is the confidence calculated here? Do the reviewers decide it themselves or it is based on a reviewer's consensus with other reviewers' decisions among all their reviews?

3

Obvious_Swordfish172 t1_iyajtec wrote

2 6 6 7 with confidence scores,
5 4 2 4

Reviewer 1 also clearly misunderstood the paper.

What are my chances?

3

Slight_Lawfulness_41 t1_ixakxc5 wrote

2 out of 5 reviewers miss. Will that be possible to add new reviews?

2

Simping4Kaiming t1_ixar1qh wrote

Chances with 4,5,6,7,8 ?

2

maybelator t1_ixc8f5q wrote

100% depends on your rebuttal. Show that you understood the low reviews and improved your paper in consequence. Or if a bad review is nonsensical make it clear with line ref and citations.

2

Simping4Kaiming t1_ixchk1c wrote

Thanks, how is the usual average ?

1

maybelator t1_ixcyhrp wrote

Papers are not selected based on their average, but wether or bot there is a consensus towards acceptance. Show the meta reviewers that you can meaningfully address the reservations of the 4 and 5, or show that they are not valid (be very careful with this route).

Based on the scores, the scale tips in your favor. But the rebuttal will be critical.

1

liujiashuo t1_ixb0o5k wrote

Got 6 reviewers ...how to reply in only a 1-page pdf...

2

__pringles__ t1_ixbd4tb wrote

64673

7 has confidence 2, rest all are of confidence 4.

The reviews are really well thought out, and recommend some good experiments, also highlight some weaknesses. Some also praise the cleverness and intuitiveness of the idea, and already thorough experiments!

I guess the new experiments will take some time to finish and update (one even asked for a user study!), so not sure whether I will be able to put new results in the rebuttal. But I suppose, the suggestions could make it a stronger submission next time! Does providing new supporting results really help during the rebuttal?

2

Purple-Obligation-70 t1_ixb1at4 wrote

Got only two reviews. Been checking cmt every hour since there won't be any notification of the added review. :\

1

Bot-69912020 t1_ixc9soc wrote

9 and 3, both confidence of 4 lol fortunately, the other reviewers are also more positive

1

pointguard0 t1_ixcqk21 wrote

got 64686, what are the chances?

1

TraditionalAd7283 t1_ixctbjc wrote

I want to congratulate you...
reviewer with score 4 would increase the value from the sound rebuttal process.

1

machinesyall t1_ixcyk4y wrote

A lot of the reviews posted here seem pretty good (mean around 6, which is toward acceptance on the scale), why are these papers considered borderline? Based on how noisy the process is it seems unlikely for a paper to get all accepts across the board...

1

ResponseVisual341 t1_ixczf3a wrote

5 5 4 5 4 (confidence: 3 2 5 4 4). Any chance of acceptance if we address the concerns (mainly more experiments)?

1

desecrated666 t1_ixduscb wrote

55546(44434) here…I am personally pessimistic already : (

1

__pringles__ t1_ixd4aok wrote

Any guide on the norms of writing a rebuttal? This is my first time writing one, so sample rebuttals will be really appreciated!

1

Pitiful_Highlight200 t1_ixg7vpq wrote

ok so if I assume that the replies here are a random sample, then basically a high percentage of people get contradictory reviews (Some very high and some very low).

I got 77744 with confidence 23344. What on earth is happening? I don’t know what my chances are but how is it possible for papers to get so different ratings?

1

Lopsided-Giraffe-671 t1_ixh41km wrote

As a reviewer, when can you see the reviews from other reviewers in CMT for AISTATS? If I remember correctly from last time, it was the same time as they were released to the authors.

1

cookiemonster1020 t1_ixqqh2l wrote

Are there instructions for format/length of rebuttal?

​

edit: nevermind, found the template at the bottom of the FAQ

1