Submitted by RobbinDeBank t3_z2hr3p in MachineLearning
ReginaldIII t1_ixhg0a6 wrote
Reply to comment by chaosmosis in [D] Schmidhuber: LeCun's "5 best ideas 2012-22” are mostly from my lab, and older by RobbinDeBank
Title isn't even misleading.
And given that the content behind the title is the length of a tweet, is it not reasonable for a person to actually just read the tweet to get the full content?
How is it a "more" arrogant claim? LeCun of his own fruition identified the most important works, and they align with works that Schmidhuber's group has put out in that time frame. That is a matter of fact, not opinion. Those peer reviewed and published works exist.
chaosmosis t1_ixhl90r wrote
"My ideas are the best in {Big Set}" versus "My ideas are the best in {Bigger Set}".
[deleted] t1_ixhrue8 wrote
[deleted]
Beor_The_Old t1_ixkef7g wrote
It’s a smaller set since it’s just 5 ideas, he didn’t make LeCunn list those specific ideas.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments