[P] Free Stable Diffusion 2.0 hosted interface

Submitted by philipkiely t3_z3xpd2 in MachineLearning

When Stable Diffusion 2.0 was released last night, we knew we wanted to get it into production as quickly as possible so that the ML community could use a free web interface to experiment with the model. And don't worry, there is no sign-in, email, or credit card required to use the demo as much as you want.

Baseten's previous Stable Diffusion demos have been used to create more than a quarter million images, but the best of them are already being blown away by the quality of images Stable Diffusion 2 produces. Try it for yourself ... let's see what you've made in comments!

Give Stable Diffusion 2 a try here: https://app.baseten.co/apps/VBlnMVP/operator_views/nBrd8zP

154

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

gokonymous t1_ixoi7p5 wrote

Some rendering issue.. please check once

11

Purplekeyboard t1_ixpb9yw wrote

Worked for me. Stable diffusion 2.0 still has the problem of putting parts of people out of the frame. NovelAI solved this problem, and put out a paper explaining how they did it.

11

Kodabey t1_ixomdp1 wrote

Doesn’t work…fail.

6

papinek t1_ixq5j0b wrote

This is fantastic

2

hapliniste t1_ixqd1ip wrote

It worked for me. I did a kangaroo riding a bike. One image was a big failure and the other one came out OK but not better than the 1.5 (but with higher details).

I'll have to see once we have the model in auto's but for now it seems 1.5 with upscaling is still better and give us more power. We'll have to see if it's better when we use upscaling on the 2.0.

Still, the model will abviously be worse for a lot of thing until we get a retrained model (unstable diffusion maybe).

2

farmingvillein t1_ixrvyv1 wrote

I tried a few iterations and the results were...unimpressive...to say the least.

Is this configured to do fewer iterative passes (to save $$$), for example? Totally understand if so, given that it is a public/free interface...just trying to rationalize why things are so meh.

2

rofaalla t1_ixpy4el wrote

It's working properly for me, thanks for sharing

1

Luftetari t1_ixrgeai wrote

worked for me. beautiful graphic, but not what I wanted.

1

ShowMeFunnyPics t1_ixyrqo2 wrote

I kept getting this message: An error occurred while rendering this component.

1