purplebrown_updown t1_iygwqo9 wrote on December 1, 2022 at 8:26 AM

This thing is insane. I’m kind of blown away. It’s scary good. And I’m someone who hates being sensationalist about AI.

Acceptable-Cress-374 t1_iyjfx19 wrote on December 1, 2022 at 9:09 PM

Yeah, my mouth dropped when I saw that ctf example posted around. It's fucking insane how much context it got from the prompt and how well it answered it. I'm waiting to see how they move the goalposts again, after this...

edit: the screenshot - https://twitter.com/gf_256/status/1598105286648422401/photo/1

Sea-Photo5230 OP t1_iygx7to wrote on December 1, 2022 at 8:33 AM

It can also produce nonsense imaginary things. It is not good at solving mathematical equations. It does have some limitations but seems impressive

Cheap_Meeting t1_iyhkxds wrote on December 1, 2022 at 1:36 PM

That now they can collect data to make it even better.

purplebrown_updown t1_iykyv2h wrote on December 2, 2022 at 3:59 AM

Now that’s it’s been out thought it’s clear there are some big deficiencies. And it has the same problem as meta’s galactica - it’s overly confident when it’s obviously wrong.

Thorusss t1_iylei4q wrote on December 2, 2022 at 6:38 AM

>it’s overly confident when it’s obviously wrong.

So too human?

maskedpaki t1_iz88px6 wrote on December 7, 2022 at 4:45 AM

this is a tradeoff for being able to answer anything at all

open ai remarks that when it wants the bot to only answer something its 99% confident about say it just never answers because theres always that one part of the answer you arent sure is right.

ThePerson654321 t1_iyiib9v wrote on December 1, 2022 at 5:33 PM

It still cannot tell a joke 😅