Submitted by Steve_Sizzou t3_zasxg5 in MachineLearning
LanchestersLaw t1_iyof6it wrote
In general: i depends on a lot of things.
For your specific case: it will almost certainly be better to feed it the raw data.
There were a couple points in your post that seem like fundamental (but common) misunderstandings of neural nets.
- you cannot scale it up infinitely, that causes over fitting there is an optimal size, finding that size depends on the problem
- summary statistics are not features. Yes it sometimes makes sense to calculate features, not it almost never makes sense to give it summary statistics
- yes neural nets identify “features”, no they are not anything you would recognize as a feature
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments