Comfortable_Use_5033 t1_iywcac8 wrote
This is actually what I looking for a good science practice. Especially when there are huge number of unreproducible papers with no code and no training config at all.
pyepyepie t1_iywmmd9 wrote
I agree. It's even worse when the cause of the improvement is different from that stated in the paper (you might as well call some papers "really? ADAM is better than SGD most of the time"), causing such a huge time-waste.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments