Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

whatstheprobability t1_iz58l5i wrote

I feel like this is saying:

  1. this won't generally replace backprop, but it could lead to insight that will lead to algorithms that will replace backprop
  2. this could improve upon backprop for some specific use cases (low power), so even if it doesn't lead to major insights, researchers can still justify spending time on it

Does that sound right?

9