Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

the_timps t1_izv7v00 wrote

Honestly you sound like ChatGPT trying to blend in.
"It's buried in a paper I linked" is not answering someone's question at all.

Not one of your pull quotes addresses OPs question. And now you're just saying "It's in the paper". If the answer is so easy to find, pull it out and answer OP explicitly.

35

farmingvillein t1_izv9qkm wrote

> "It's buried in a paper I linked" is not answering someone's question at all.

Lol, yeah, particularly when the answer isn't in the paper.

16

anymorenevermore t1_izvovtv wrote

> Honestly you sound like ChatGPT trying to blend in.

nah, LLM are not that annoying....yet

16

[deleted] t1_izv9q9t wrote

[deleted]

−3

maxToTheJ t1_izvck2o wrote

I wasnt even asking to read the paper but the public blog which is supposed to be the distilled down version for a larger audience.

−1

maxToTheJ t1_izvc2ys wrote

> Not one of your pull quotes addresses OPs question.

The very first part I quote answers the very first question.

>Has Open AI said what ChatGPT's architecture is?

from the blog

>ChatGPT is fine-tuned from a model in the GPT-3.5 series,

−10

the_timps t1_izvgbc0 wrote

>The very first part I quote answers the very first question.

No it doesn't.

ChatGPT is GPT is not the question they are asking.

5

maxToTheJ t1_izvhei6 wrote

You realize there are different versions of GPT.

The blog tells you the exact version and I gave the link to the paper which explains the training tricks to get it to learn better.

−8