Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

NinoIvanov t1_j0e64wx wrote

No. And even if you look at "identical" twins — who were developed not only from the same DNA, but also in the same nutritional, hormonal and biochemical environment — they are highly similar, but not "identical".

0

aussie_punmaster t1_j0e7bhl wrote

Yet they are similar enough to be identified as identical twins. That’s what you’d be aiming for here, not perfection.

4

jakderrida t1_j0e94ka wrote

I'd imagine since the aim to predict (or generate?) a photo of the person, OP is tolerant of much more imperfection than you're thinking.

1