Submitted by No-Stay9943 t3_zovnxo in MachineLearning
[removed]
Comments
Cherubin0 t1_j0praak wrote
If you cannot find an endorsement. You can submit it to a scientific journal. Usually if they allow you to post it on arxiv you also can post it on your personal website. Note you might get rejected, but then you can use the feedback to improve the paper and submit it to another journal or same journal again. It is normal to get rejected at first.
Binliner42 t1_j0qmmti wrote
Deposit as a preprint. If critical, find the funds for publication, and submit to a journal. If the science is sound then endorsement is unnecessary.
Celmeno t1_j0p73ax wrote
Why do you want to put it on arxiv if you dont do research as a job? What journal/conference do you plan to submit to? (If you don't then imho arxiving it is not worth it). If your article is good I might be able to help you
edit: I was not arguing for keeping good research behind a paywall. Public money, public code and open science are issues I very much support (e.g. by publicly available post prints of my own work and open soruce code). I do, however, think that writing a good paper is a lot of work and from someone unknown I very much doubt this will gain any traction just being arxived even if it is good
anymorenevermore t1_j0pnrz1 wrote
Gatekeeping at its finest.
"Hey you, patent clerk why do you want to publish at Annalen der Physik if you are not a researcher huh huh?"
Publishing a good preprint to arxiv has all the benefits and 0 cost, and it is not only for people publishing for conferences
Celmeno t1_j0pocem wrote
Where did I imply I was gatekeeping? I was just stating that I don't think it is worth the effort to write a paper if it will stay on arxiv
Phoneaccount25732 t1_j0q7map wrote
Some of us are in it for the betterment of mankind.
7366241494 t1_j0q967r wrote
That is a selfish view of science. Some people just want to expand our knowledge available to everyone. It has nothing to do with fame or a career.
Most of the papers I read come from arxiv, and I find it annoying that anything in science should be paywalled. IMO we need more open review and less gatekeeping. I don’t care much about official paid peer review. I’ve found basic mistakes in source code in areas that weren’t even mentioned in the paper (e.g. preprocessing) Can’t trust peer review anyway.
Celmeno t1_j0qaw0s wrote
You seem to have no idea about the scientific process. But that's okay. Not everyone has to know everything. I did not argue against putting it out there available to all. All my papers are publicly available via my university and most are on arxiv as well. I was just stating the opinion that writing a good paper for it to never be read is not worth the effort.
lolillini t1_j0qexfe wrote
And what makes you think that (i) every good paper would be published in a conference/journal, and (ii) every paper that is published in a good conference/journal is good. My experience says both of these are wrong.
Celmeno t1_j0qh32a wrote
The vast majority of good papers (95+%) will be properly published after a while. This has been thee reality for decades.
Not every paper there will be good. There are mediocre conferences with amazing papers. There are top conferences with questionable papers. Regardless, the tendency is still clear.
I will gladly give OP feedback. But to state that publishing is not the primary way to get research out is just disingenuous
7366241494 t1_j0qz7eu wrote
“The” scientific process? I was not aware that philosophers of science had strong agreement on such a singular process. I could be wrong. Please enlighten me: what IS the scientific process?
IMO the fact that there are very few replication studies published, if any, due to “lack of originality” is in itself quite damning of whatever you want to call the modern publishing/gatekeeping process.
Do you think Einstein would get published in today’s environment? IMO no.
vwings t1_j0p92zm wrote
Send the article to the authors of the works you are mainly building on. They might endorse you if they find the article reasonable. And they have a small incentive because their citation count increases when your article is on arxiv...