Submitted by rapp17 t3_zspe6r in MachineLearning
blablanonymous t1_j1dp14o wrote
Reply to comment by LimitedConsequence in [P] Regression Model With Added Constraint by rapp17
If you just want to normalize everything why creating a custom activation function that just does that?
LimitedConsequence t1_j1ep2ui wrote
I'm not sure I understand what you mean?
blablanonymous t1_j1f4wy6 wrote
You’re suggesting Softmax then normalize to whatever is required. Softmax takes the exponential of the value then performs the normalization. You might not want that exponential. You can create a layer that does the normality through a custom activation function you use in the last layer
LimitedConsequence t1_j1fdayy wrote
Yes I was implicitly talking about the final activation function. With regards to softmax, he said in another comment "I have a quantity of 100 units that need to be allocated across 50 days.", so I took that to imply the outputs should be positive (hence the exponential is reasonable).
blablanonymous t1_j1fdeb6 wrote
Ha good point
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments