Submitted by markhachman t3_10bddey in MachineLearning
HaMMeReD t1_j49sktf wrote
Reply to comment by itsnotlupus in [D] Is MusicGPT a viable possibility? by markhachman
Nope, from terms of use regarding ai output.
OpenAI hereby assigns to you all its right, title and interest in and to Output.
Besides, they have commercial apis, paid plans etc. Obviously they endorse commercial use.
zaptrem t1_j4a4bhl wrote
Jukebox license is different from the one you're thinking of.
HaMMeReD t1_j4a6edc wrote
Not really. Attribution only, no other restrictions.
zaptrem t1_j4a6k1f wrote
>No portion of the Software, nor any content created with the Software, may be used for commercial purposes.
HaMMeReD t1_j4a7i5q wrote
ah it does say that, and noncommercial license at the top as well.
Doesn't matter much, you can't realistically use it anyways.
The source is there, but I don't think it's a pre-trained model, and it sounds really slow (like a second of audio will be like an hour of processing). It'd probably cost less to commission a real musician.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments