Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ML4Bratwurst t1_j4vfax7 wrote

I think one important part here is the "misalignment" of the images. Have you tried to cut and resize the images, so that they show the same region? You don't need a GAN then

3

kingdroopa OP t1_j4vguxt wrote

The GAN models I've tested are based on the 'unaligned' approach (e.g. CycleGAN). I still have not tested to cut and resize the images, to make them show the same region. My immediate thought would be that the top-and-bottom of both images might dissapear, but perhaps its ok still?

1

tdgros t1_j4vipol wrote

if the two cameras are rigidly fixed, then you can calibrate them like one calibrates a stereo pair, and at least align the orientation and intrinsics. The points very far from the camera will be well aligned, the ones very close will remain unaligned.

The calibration process will involve you pointing positions by hand, but the maths for the correction is very very simple after that.

5