Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

bigbird1996 t1_j5ql6y3 wrote

1 weak reject, 2 rejects 😢 This is also my first ever submission to any conference ever. Time to learn to not suck lol

22

KrakenInAJar t1_j5pvfuw wrote

3 borderline (3), 1 weak accept (4), better than feared but I guess I will run on adrenaline for the next month...

19

Extension_Ad7308 t1_j5qasrl wrote

May I please ask whether borderline corresponds to a score '3' and weak accept to a score '4'? thank you

4

goldemerald t1_j5psrue wrote

3 borderlines?!?!?

I've been in a state of shock for an hour.

13

sskdkn_pl t1_j5r7u9b wrote

I also got this… Anyone with this score got accepted in the past?

3

synonymous1964 t1_j5sz1gg wrote

At ICCV 2021, we got a paper accepted with initial reviews of borderline, borderline, weak reject.

If the reviewers' comments are addressable, and you do so in a good rebuttal, there is a chance for acceptance with a bit of luck.

6

toftinosantolama t1_j5rtegr wrote

I don't have an answer to your question, but given that the reviewers don't know the scores of the rest of the reviewers during the rebuttal, a good rebuttal could raise potentially all of them, but even with 2 borderlines being raised to weak accepts, accept should be possible. Good lucks folks.

2

sskdkn_pl t1_j5rzgtt wrote

Thanks for your reply…! You just brighten my day and give me the courage to response the reviewers… Thanks again!

3

deep_noob t1_j6gab7l wrote

I think during discussion they will know about the other reviews, otherwise there is point of discussion

1

Rolling_Pig t1_j5q71oi wrote

2 Weak accept and 1 weak reject.
Is there any chance for me?

10

toftinosantolama t1_j5rsup2 wrote

Should be. Fightable, you should do a good rebuttal. Only hope the reviewers are not the classic cvpr reviewers (ignorant juniors)...

8

jete_jeong t1_j5sh67o wrote

Definitely yes. Your co-author will help you :)

1

bombay_doors t1_j5qtjb0 wrote

People who got orals in the previous years, what was your average score

8

maybelator t1_j5t6ao4 wrote

Had orals recently with 4,4,4->5,5,4 and 4,4,4->5,5,5 (pre->post rebuttal). I think the strong accepts are a must, never had an oral without them.

7

deep_noob t1_j6g9pgq wrote

three weak accepts, remain same after rebuttal

2

the_architect_ai t1_j5qks8o wrote

Phd student here.

1 accept (5), 2 Borderline (3). What are the chances of my paper getting accepted?

7

realHansen t1_j5qxn18 wrote

If you write a good rebuttal I'd be hopeful. You have two reviewers undecided, and one apparently willing to champion your paper. In my experience, if things do shuffle after the rebuttal, ratings tend to gravitate towards the pre-rebuttal mean. In your case that would be a good thing :)

5

entarko t1_j5qlmuc wrote

Possible with a good rebuttal and a little bit of luck that the reviewers are willing to change their mind. But borderline suggest that their opinion is not set in stone, so not a bad sign, and the accept will point them in that direction.

4

toftinosantolama t1_j5rtquc wrote

They won't know about the accept afaik.

0

entarko t1_j5rujuz wrote

There is an official discussion period between reviewers and AC starting on the 31st of January. It would be weird not to know other reviewers ratings. It would be unprecedented, as it was the case for, at least, the last three years.

2

toftinosantolama t1_j5ruw81 wrote

I might be wrong of course, that's my impression from a discussion earlier today. BTW I think it'd be more fair not to know.

1

entarko t1_j5rvhgc wrote

Since there is a discussion period, not having access to the initial reviews would only be a waste of time. As a reviewer, you would re-write arguments from your review, which could have simply been read from the initial review.

2

toftinosantolama t1_j5rvxa3 wrote

Well the rating could be hidden... Not that this is the problem, the problem is that the reviews are really entitled and not willing to stand corrected. I've these so many times. And I'd bet this kind of reveiwrs are phd students, not very clever ones.

0

entarko t1_j5rx5mc wrote

The "entitlement" of reviewers is, quite often (I would say 50/50), a result of the authors' response. I have reviewed several papers where authors responded to fair comments by dismissing the reviewers and trying to make him feel dumb. That invariably ends up in reviewers not changing / lowering their rating.

Also, PhD students can be good reviewers.

2

toftinosantolama t1_j5rxq32 wrote

I don't doubt your experience. Mine is totally different. I've never flipped one reviewer even thought I've always been polite and the reviewer clearly and objectively wrong. They just don't care. They have too much power. The AC just goes with the flow. This is not peer review, it's a joke.

This is not the case in ML conferences, according to my experience, it's a CV thing...

1

Miserable-Guitar-475 t1_j5sg2j2 wrote

2 borderline and 1 weak accept. I need to fight for it… wish me good luck

7

silenac t1_j5q1lu3 wrote

1 borderline, 2 weak rejects. For the first submission, it’s okay. Is there any statistics on changing the recommendations after rebuttal?

5

KrakenInAJar t1_j5q51at wrote

Common wisdom is to not bet on flipping, but it is a case by case thing and it can happen.
Read the reviews and if you can deliver a good, carefully worded rebuttal you may flip one or two. But in the end it depends on how open the reviewers are to flip.

9

tt19234 t1_j5q8xpm wrote

Is there any public statistics of past years CVPR? Like what is the average score for those who got published??

5

Minimum-Physical t1_j5qnwxv wrote

2 borderline (3), 1 weak reject (2) and a reject (1). Both borderline seem possible to change. The other two might be able to increase by a point. What are the odds? Or should we withdraw? Thanks :)

5

Great-Ad8037 t1_j5qmns0 wrote

2 borderlines (3), 1 weak reject (2). The confidence level of both borderlines is 4, and for the weak reject its 2. Do you think there's a chance for flipping and acceptance?

3

didroth t1_j5r6r2j wrote

1 weak reject (2), 1 borderline (3), 1 weak accept (4), 1 accept (5).

A split decision!

3

Equivalent_Future207 t1_j5rth3t wrote

3 reviewers, 2 weak reject, 1 borderline. I will do my best... but I'm not sure whether the reviews are flipped.

3

LetWrong1932 t1_j5u9j27 wrote

1 wa, 2 b, and 1 r ... is there any chance for me?

3

LetWrong1932 t1_j5ul63q wrote

just curious, if a reviewer changes his/her score, can authors see it immediately or when final decision appears?

3

Expensive-Track t1_j60yf7a wrote

Not sure myself but I doubt they'll make anything available before the final decision

2

Rainandblame t1_j5rc318 wrote

2 borderline (3), 1 weak accept (4) and 1 weak reject (2). Any chances with this?

2

maybelator t1_j5t6yba wrote

More likely no, but if your rebuttal can change the reject it can go through. Spend a lot of effort on this reviewer.

1

aloo_parantha t1_j5se8dr wrote

1 reject, 1 weak reject ans 1 borderline. Is there a chance during the rebuttal process ?

2

Jack7heRapper t1_j5srvwo wrote

2 borderline 1 reject. If it wasn't for reviewer 3, I would've considered a rebuttal

2

juanigp t1_j5swklo wrote

This was my first submission, I had a worse score than you but will write a rebuttal either ways (although I doubt I can convince everyone). Why wouldn't you? I'm not judging, asking out of curiosity as I don't know the "common practice" .

3

Jack7heRapper t1_j5syos0 wrote

It's my first submission too, and I'm an undergrad lol.
I've heard from my seniors and professors that changing a reject (1) to borderline (3) or weak accept (4) is difficult and that you need at least all borderlines to have a shot at getting accepted. They still told me to write it anyway for the experience.
Moreover, the confidence level of that reject is 4. The problem is that the reviewer asked for experimental results on an additional dataset, which I didn't work on. So, I'm not really sure how I can improve their score.
The other reviewers weren't too harsh with their reviews and I probably could have convinced them but I don't think I can convince reviewer #3 without quantitative results to back up my claims.

1

maybelator t1_j5t74ae wrote

Reviewers are not allowed to ask for more experiments. You could signal this to the area chair. But ultimately, the paper probably won't be accepted.

Do write a rebuttal however, it's a great exercise.

3

Expensive-Track t1_j5u30ch wrote

What's the scale of reviewer confidence scores?
Why isn't there a clear guide about this on the website or anywhere else? :/

2

KrakenInAJar t1_j5uwbp0 wrote

I think its one to five, but it is relativly arbitrary, the real confidence score is between the lines of the actual review. If a reviewer is inclined to change his mind it usually shows by the way the review is written.

3

avd4292 t1_j5v0hud wrote

4,3,4. What are the chances?

2

LetWrong1932 t1_j5wduib wrote

heard that those scores got accepted last year, maybe quite good!

4

Ready-Blacksmith-411 t1_j5w7hap wrote

1 weak accept and 2 weak reject with only theoretical comments, is it possible to have opportunity to increase the score once I rebuttals well? Really worried about that

2

steve-phan t1_j5y6u4i wrote

1 borderline and 2 weak rejects. Is there any chance?

2

AvailablePresent1113 t1_j6cf8e9 wrote

I really want to know what is the minimum scores after rebuttal to get accepted? As after rebuttal things should only be A, WA, WR, R, will 3 WA secure acceptance or can 2 WA, 1 WR get any chance?

2

LetWrong1932 t1_j6cj48c wrote

why is there no B after rebuttal?

1

AvailablePresent1113 t1_j6cnhq4 wrote

Well I previously submitted to ICCV so it's just my guess as ICCV did not have B post rebuttal. So B after rebuttal is still valid?

2

LetWrong1932 t1_j6d7hoq wrote

i've heard there was a B at post rebuttal last year so maybe there is for cvpr

2

AvailablePresent1113 t1_j6de88y wrote

Okay, thank you for your information. Do you know what is the minimum score after rebuttal to get accepted? Thanks xD

1

LetWrong1932 t1_j6gpp34 wrote

there's no such "minimum score" because there's always an exception but heard that 3 3 4 or 3 4 4 fairly gets accepted (not sure tho)

2

machine_learning7 t1_j5uoo02 wrote

2 strong R's, 1 weak accept. Probably a very low chance of success.

Can I add more references to the paper between now? I.e. I wish to answer some reviewers by saying I will add the references they want me to add and talk about the differences between my work and the reference.

1

Gershel t1_j5xxpny wrote

1 WR (2) and 2 WA (4). Don't think it gets in unless I get to change the WR with a good rebuttal. But he/she basically didn't get the motivation and didn't understand the method...

1

LetWrong1932 t1_j5ymzk4 wrote

try your best to explain and convince WR. also the two WAs might help u convince in post rebuttal, so just spend a lot on it!

3

drakesword514 t1_j600glr wrote

Scores: 5, 3, 2 The one with score 2 gave a very vague review. Hard to rebute anything or understand what the reviewer is really contesting. One with score 3 seems to be willing to change score if major points are convinced. What are my chances?

1

LetWrong1932 t1_j62mke8 wrote

think it's quite good, try ur best on improving 3 and he/she and the 5 will probably convince 2 :)

2

Complete-Drag-2694 t1_j63emsz wrote

Hi, do u think 332 has a chance to get accepted? 2 said that he/she is willing to improve the score if I can address his/her concerns (which I think I can).

Thanks!

1