Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

nmkd t1_j6cipol wrote

In case someone is interested, I implemented this in my Stable Diffusion Windows GUI:

https://nmkd.itch.io/t2i-gui

(Source Code: https://github.com/n00mkrad/text2image-gui/)

58

JohnConquest t1_j6cmp5z wrote

Fantastic! All your AI GUIs are great stuff.

Would love to see a GUI for Whisper sooner or later, not really a good, all-in-one install for it out there AFAIK.

17

omgpop t1_j6cmydr wrote

There’s Buzz.

3

JohnConquest t1_j6fzh66 wrote

Thanks for the suggestion, just tried it out however and there seems to be a bug or two, one of which is where it loops the same subtitle over and over.

1

onnod t1_j6g9t00 wrote

>InstructPix2Pix

Can this run on CPU?

1

nmkd t1_j6gaf5g wrote

I think so, haven't tried though

1

IshKebab t1_j6e2n44 wrote

Put this in a $1 app asap...

14

HermanCainsGhost t1_j6edce9 wrote

It's already in a free app, Draw Things

Note: not mine, just like it a lot

5

[deleted] t1_j6bocy5 wrote

[removed]

8

DadSnare t1_j6bwxss wrote

Check my post history for some ways I’m using it.

3

whisp96 t1_j6cm1c7 wrote

Nice interface

3

JEFFREY_EPSTElN t1_j6do61l wrote

Can someone explain how this differs from the Prompt-2-Prompt system that was used to generate the training data for this model?

3

off99555 t1_j6hvsgn wrote

This model asks you to put instructions instead of two prompts describing the input and output images.

2

JEFFREY_EPSTElN t1_j6iot4n wrote

Ah thanks. That's a really clever trick for making training data.

1

ninjawick t1_j6egkao wrote

The balance between image and text cgf is awkward. Doesn't give consistent results. Creates totally different images but with given prompt. Hope they find something to fix it.

2

[deleted] t1_j6dgkxh wrote

[removed]

−16

Ne_Nel t1_j6djktq wrote

Now art will be more concept than skill based. That means a lot more people having the chance to expand their creativity. Yes, such an horrible thing. /s

7

TrumanCian t1_j6dwqbk wrote

Oh no, those artists will lose their jobs instead of using AI as a tool to improve their work!!! Just like when Photoshop came out!!! /s

3

Kerbal634 t1_j6ead9n wrote

Definitely don't blame the capitalists going with the cheaper option at the expense of quality for sure

2

DataSnaek t1_j6e43a5 wrote

People have been losing their jobs to automation for centuries. Artists complaining about AI annoy me because they act all high and mighty like they’re somehow above every other job that’s been replaced in the past 200 years.

You’re not above a factory worker who loses his or her job to a robot, but I doubt you ever thought for more than a second about those workers. It’s part and parcel of technological advances and if you want to stay relevant you have to move to higher levels of abstraction. Learn to work with the AI and let it enhance your work.

1

Low_Basil9900 t1_j6da8hb wrote

All AI art is gross and you can't convince me otherwise.

−37

HermanCainsGhost t1_j6ds2pp wrote

I mean then you find AI gross generally… and thus, why are you here?

16

Low_Basil9900 t1_j6erauj wrote

I don't. It's a useful tool. Im interested in learning how it works so i can understand what I'm being presented with - specifically when it comes to segmentation and feature identification in images.

I just feel physically repulsed by the output from the Art.

The textures, the colours, the composites between different images to produce the final result. They make me really uncomfortable. It's a physical sensation.

0

HermanCainsGhost t1_j6iy9fn wrote

Sounds like an issue you should talk to your psychologist about. I certainly feel no physical sensation when looking at AI art (or any art) beyond "oh this looks good" or "this looks ugly" (if those even count as physical sensations).

It's very weird to have such a visceral feeling of disgust just based on looking at art.

> the composites between different images to produce the final result

Lol, that's not how AI art works. Are you sure you're in the right place? See that's the problem being in a space like this - you are very likely talking to someone who actually knows how things work.

AI art works by denoising, it isn't a "composite". It isn't "mixing images". It doesn't have images to mix.

Stable Diffusion for example, was trained on 240 terabytes of data - 2.3 billion 512x512 images, and the models are between 2 to 8 gigabytes of data. That means equivalent to about 1-4 bytes of data per image (with a 512x512 image being a bit bigger than 250 kilobytes in total size).

Suffice to say, you cannot compress 250,000 bytes of data into 1-4 bytes of data (mathematically, it is impossible). If that level of compression was possible, that would be the bigger story compared to AI art, because data transmission just got a wholllllllllleeeeeee lot faster, by orders of magnitude.

So yeah, get out of here with that "composite" nonsense. There's no composite. It's literally mathematically impossible for there to be a composite.

1

TrumanCian t1_j6dwrpq wrote

Because...?

3

Low_Basil9900 t1_j6eq5hq wrote

It looks disgusting. Look at the hands on the cake. Look ar woodie's brow. It makes me feel queasy.

1