Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mkzoucha t1_j6edujv wrote

Reply to comment by YoutubeStruggle in [P] AI Content Detector by YoutubeStruggle

Also, one more thing, at the end of the day there is no way to prove either way without having students record their screens and entire rooms (or only do in person) when writing papers

3

YoutubeStruggle OP t1_j6eh9z2 wrote

AI can generate text that resembles human writing, but it is still not capable of truly replicating the depth and nuance of human writing. AI text generation models can generate text that is coherent and grammatically correct, but it lacks the personal touch, creativity, and emotional depth that is unique to human writing. This is because AI is trained on large amounts of data and generates text based on statistical patterns in the data, whereas human writing is influenced by personal experiences, emotions, and individual perspectives. Additionally, AI text generation models may still struggle with context-awareness and understanding the full meaning behind the words it is generating. So, AI-generated content can often be distinguished from human-written content by its lack of originality and personal touch.

That's what chatgpt thinks about writing text resembling human-generated content :)

−3

mkzoucha t1_j6eied9 wrote

What are your training sample sizes? What about test? How was your data compiled? Labeled? What ai models? What were the sources of human writing?

2

YoutubeStruggle OP t1_j6ekdz9 wrote

My total data size is 40K paragraphs, where I have used Roberta-base and chatGPT was used for ai-generated sentences.

0