Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

whiskey_bud t1_j7eit5o wrote

>I get that he is one of the godfathers of AI. Mostly on the research side which immediately puts him very hostile against engineers

I find it odd that you seem to expect / want a serious conversation, but then start with some weird ad-hominem against the man. You talk about "fanbois" in your first sentence, but then expose yourself as nothing better, to be honest. The rest of your post isn't much better TBH - trying in infer intentionality and make false equivalencies.

23

supersoldierboy94 OP t1_j7ej5p9 wrote

Please point out the 'ad hominem' against him instead of generalities when I just literally quoted all the things he said and gave my own take on it.

> infer intentionality

Point it out. You can conclude intentionality based on his line of reasoning, conversation trails, and position.

1

whiskey_bud t1_j7ekfua wrote

>Please point out the 'ad hominem' against him

I literally quoted it.

9

supersoldierboy94 OP t1_j7em0v4 wrote

That's not an ad hominem. An ad hominem attacks the subject as basis of its argument. Telling that this person is X based on Y is not ad hominem. It's a conclusion of the quotes I laid down.

5