Submitted by supersoldierboy94 t3_10uw974 in MachineLearning
du_dt t1_j7eohva wrote
MetaAI released their galactica chatbot a month before chatgpt, but it was heavily criticized for “dangerous AI generated pseudoscience nonsense” and shutdown a few days lter. Now OpenAI does the same and everyone praises them - well, I get why Yann is being saulty about it.
ok531441 t1_j7eu88c wrote
Galactica was doomed to fail because it was specifically marketed as a science tool which puts very high expectations on factual and mathematical correctness. ChatGPT on the other hand is marketed as chat.
visarga t1_j7kkc5b wrote
Maybe they come to their senses and put it back. I wanted to use it to find references for my random ideas, see what results they have.
supersoldierboy94 OP t1_j7esbbj wrote
Fair point. But why is he blaming the people instead of his whole company going as far as "it's just people destroying Meta's reputation"?
I have high respects for him as a researcher, and in fact I've read his books and papers. He's great when he speaks as a researcher. It's different when he's speaks as a Meta employee vested with the companies interest. That's why I take his Meta-driven statements for/against companies with a grain of salt.
I wont be even surprised if the big tech companies are behind the Stable Diffusion/Midjourney lawsuit since it would do them good. Considering the fact that Meta partnered with Shutterstock to produce their own.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments