Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

supersoldierboy94 OP t1_j7f1die wrote

> some variant of it Just the other day, some researchers already released BioGPT which is trained on biomedical text. It's particularly good. Sitll needs some time to test its accuracy against real medical professionals

I'd respectfully disagree on the usage. While it has been shown to generate weird sequences, with the right usage, you can guide it to create particularly effective articles and stories. It's summarization tool is also good. Grammar is particularly good as well.

> What chatGPT represents to him

It can be true and petty at the same time. When asked, he will revert to complaining why Galactica was shut down blaming the people using it and pointing as to why ChatGPT does more mistakes but is still standing. Why would someone also suddenly post a paper contribution chart saying that others just 'consume' the research?

−1

OneMillionSnakes t1_j7h28eq wrote

Yeah I mean these seem grounded and not that petty to me personally but that's fairly subjective. His criticisms seem fairly mild. I don't think they're worth getting worked up over.

2