What a joke! I have a reviewer clearly champions for rejection and the two other reviews are completely yes-men. The rejecting reviewer did acknowledge some of my rebuttals, but then make some more non-sense excuses just to drag my paper down. The other reviewers just agree with anything he/she said without any clear stance. Seriously, I think there should be rules and restrictions for reviewers to say anything they conveniently want as "marginal"/"incremental"/...