Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

EngineersAnon t1_itak198 wrote

It would run into issues with the Federal Constitution's guarantee, in the Fifth Amendment, that "... private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation." That would get gorram expensive, gorram fast.

5

sy33d_am33r_ali t1_itbm2j2 wrote

That’s only if you seize the property and make it public land. Granting public access to private land is a different thing, and Maine already has several similar laws on the books. The Great Ponds Act, etc.

1

EngineersAnon t1_itbn1xi wrote

Outright seizure is not essential for a taking. In the Great Ponds Act, the land to which access is granted must be unimproved, which is very different than letting people cross and occupy your front lawn, or a maintained beach to which you hitherto charged access fees.

1