Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

weakenedstrain t1_iy9qzlq wrote

Thank you for this.

I still use resistbot through text:

504-09

15

Yourbubblestink t1_iy9w8ld wrote

It’s a tough call because we need to have the situation resolved

−29

Suitable_Turnover835 t1_iy9xi71 wrote

I'm confused on the matter, so the average rail worker makes 24-30 dollars an hour, has good benefits, and retirement funds etc. why are we calling representatives?

−28

mymaineaccount46 t1_iy9xyfu wrote

Not all of the railroad unions ratified the new contract and they will be going on strike in a week or so. Congress has the power to intervene so people will want you to call either to support the workers, or to support preventing the strike.

It's a rough situation that we should all hope gets resolved to everyone's satisfaction before a strike. A strike will make a hard winter even worse.

8

PGids t1_iya4csj wrote

It’s not a pay issue, look into BNSF and their Hi-Viz attendance policy; even the revised version is completely asinine. The company basically owns you and you’re penalized for damn near any time you take off

Oh but you can earn some of it back! By working 14 days consecutively. As someone who also works in heavy industry currently (pulp and paper millwright) and has worked 40+ days in a row during turbine shutdowns as a contractor, lack of rest days is how people get complacent and die

38

MTcountry26 t1_iyaft4p wrote

No, it’s not a “make enough “ issue. It’s a quality of life issue, a work life balance issue.

Many railroad workers are On Call. 24/7/365. There are no days off. Scheduling time off for doctors visits dental appointments, hell let alone an afternoon off for personal time ends up costing the employee points against them. Enough points acquired in a period of time and they’re fired. We want sick days. PTO. That’s what the disagreement is about.

27

fredezz t1_iyag29p wrote

Everybody wants more money and better benefits. And realistically speaking, always will.

−31

MSCOTTGARAND t1_iyal993 wrote

Industrial trades are a nightmare. Chasing work, ridiculous hours, yeah the pay is great and benefits are phenomenal but you're a slave to the trade and hope you live long enough to enjoy your pension and annuity. I left the boilermakers to take care of my kids but I worked a 5 month job that turned into 2 years. 13 hours a day, 7 days a week with only Thanksgiving and Christmas off. It was supposed to be 12s but the plant wanted an hour turnover to so they wouldn't lose a second of work.

17

Bywater t1_iyay0l8 wrote

I hope they wildcat.

Our labor protections were never much more than lip service, the bare minimum required to keep the labor movement from then 1920's from burning the whole show right to the ground. They don't teach it in schools for the obvious reasons of not wanting people to know how powerful collective bargaining and industrial action can be, but it was a bloody violent conflict that had the state backing the wealthy elites at every opportunity. Every single strike was called a "riot" in the press and met with violence from both police, private mercenaries and in some cases the military itself. The thing is with the rampant abuse of wealth in our government, citizens united, politicians clearly violating their ethics by taking money, sweet gigs when they are done, insider trading... You all know what I talking about that at this point the only thing that will save us from some kind of dystopian capitalistic corporatocracy is going to be a real rebirth of the labor movement. We are ripe for it, way to many people are working full time and still can not survive, these rail workers were treated fucking horribly, when you cant make it anyway and your life sucks even when you are pissing away your ticks on the old clock making some rich prick richer, might as well strike.

37

Bywater t1_iyaycdi wrote

Tell us you have not even looked at the reasons they are striking without telling us you didn't even look at the reasons they were striking...

23

Bywater t1_iyaykrs wrote

For sure. They only way to enjoy life in the trades is to hang your own shingle, or maybe find a co-op or partnership where everyone involved has the same mindset. I know so many guys in the trades who have the house, all the toys, the kids and never get to see any of it. They just end up physically and mentally broken and bitter by the time they hit 40.

7

bent_peepee t1_iyb48tq wrote

oh jeez don’t tell them about healthcare workers who’ve been through worse.

how much training do you need to do that job again?

−23

turd_sculptor t1_iyba5zj wrote

Can you imagine that both railroad workers and healthcare workers deserve better? Do you think that railroad workers getting a better contract for themselves somehow takes something away from healthcare workers?

The railroad workers get no sick time. None. Sick time is a standard for workers in a lot of the rest of the world.

21

MaineBoston t1_iybc8jn wrote

Great idea! Will do this tomorrow!

2

Fireonpoopdick t1_iybtw5v wrote

Then form a Union? Or be a little bitch and move jobs because you're so cucked by your workplace you won't even try and improve your own life, maybe try being less weak and pathetic?

−10

Frirish11 t1_iybu5lz wrote

Motherclucker! I just posted about this on my fb account. What a hypocrite! I’m a card carrying member of the National Writers Union and he thinks he can ride on his Plastic Paddy Irish coattails and throw my fellow union sisters and brothers under the bus of filthy lucre, then he’s got another think coming. I have not yet begun to write.

−1

RelativeMotion1 t1_iybvchs wrote

Maybe I’m missing it, but it doesn’t seem like they implied causation?

Seems like they’re worried that a railroad strike would cause a temporary increase in cost, while inflation is already high. Which seems fairly reasonable, but is apparently controversial?

5

WhiteMainer t1_iycfwq0 wrote

What is the outcome you’re hoping for? Is it “supporting railroad workers” to force them to accept a contract? Or is if pro railroad workers to allow the negotiations and bargaining to continue.

Hard to claim you have leverage if the government is going to force your hand in the end to accept a deal, no?

0

PGids t1_iycjyq5 wrote

The outage heavy trades especially; I’ve been on a “seven day” turbine outage that lasted 63 days because we realized just about everything that could be cracked was cracked lol

I miss those paychecks and perdiem like a bastard but I can pull the insane hours where I’m at now and sleep in my own bed every night

3

LumpyBumpyToad t1_iyctjdi wrote

The railroad industry made 20 bn in PROFITS last year.

If you don't support our RR workers getting paid sick leave and a little vacation you're a giant piece of shit and I'm not going to pretend otherwise for a moment.

So put down your anti-labor, anti-union mostly-right-wing bullshit and show up for your communities for once. They're not asking for too much and if you think they are you can fuck right off to suicide-net China where you belong.

17

Wjbskinsfan t1_iycwqzl wrote

Unfortunately this only encourages them to enact provisions in The Railway Labor Act to force rail workers to accept a deal they don’t want to. All of the “pro railroad workers” talk coming out of Washington is complete BS and political spin.

2

Mag72207mrg t1_iyd0c2c wrote

Why, they don't care about us or what we support.... They care about their wallets.

−4

weakenedstrain t1_iydl0t6 wrote

The controversial piece is that workers want quality of life, owners pulled in $20 billion last year alone. Owners like Warren Buffet can allow workers to have FOUR unpaid days off, instead they get ZERO days off.

It’s barbaric. Almost as barbaric as blaming the workers for choices made at the executive level.

2

weakenedstrain t1_iydlg0g wrote

Well yeah, as long as all the power lies in corporate with the government backing them, these are worries. Forcing a contract in workers who rejected it will strengthen the worries your friends are feeling.

3

Emp3r0r_01 t1_iydn2xj wrote

I agree with this entirely. The only time unions are a draw back is when governments screw them over and let corporations or local governments screw people. A great example of this is public ed. without the right to go on strike it hampers the ability to negotiate!

2

_Schneebley t1_iydsht3 wrote

Exactly, The Fed can only do basically 2 things, raise interest rates to curb inflation and purchase assets (and lower interest rates) during an economic crisis. Thats...it... They don't control spending, taxation, ect. They only control the money supply and provide liquidity to the market. Federal Reserve is only reactionary to what Capitol Hill is doing and the economy at large.

0

baxterstate t1_iye9nye wrote

Did the railroad workers initially have sick days which were taken away, or did they take the job knowing there were no sick days?

1

Yourbubblestink t1_iyed76k wrote

Right but it’s also not a reason to let the American economy collapse. There are plenty of workers who have not gotten colas. In fact, annual increases, don’t even exist in the world of nonprofits.

0

Yourbubblestink t1_iyerqjl wrote

No, we’re not talking about slavery. In fact, that’s a super dramatic comparison to try to make.

We’re talking about a negotiation in which people are unhappy with what’s being offered to them. That’s a long way from slavery my friend it’s called capitalism.

0