Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

IamSauerKraut t1_j5afl2s wrote

>If it's good soil (which we don't have a lot of up here) then it should be protected.

No farms, no food.

3

TarantinoFan23 t1_j5aqpn7 wrote

Would you shit upstream from your camp? Time is a stream.

2

IamSauerKraut t1_j5at4tq wrote

Nonsensical rubbish.

−1

TarantinoFan23 t1_j5avy8y wrote

What part? It is is a very simple statement. I am just pointing out that poisoning soil is like ruining the future.

1

IamSauerKraut t1_j5c62k8 wrote

It is a statement which appears not responsive to anything I posted.

0

TarantinoFan23 t1_j5cajve wrote

I was trying to just say the same thing as you but in a way that is less... Ambiguous as to the reasoning

0

TheDanMonster t1_j5bifrm wrote

More than that, there’s no water to farm in North Yarmouth. I come from well drilling and a lot of north Yarmouth is bone dry unless you spend north of $25k on a well. And that’s just for domestic use…

0

IamSauerKraut t1_j5cai2i wrote

>a lot of north Yarmouth is bone dry

You've got 2 brooks merging with the Royal River in North Yarmouth. Last time I was near Runaround Pond, it was not dry so Chandler Brook cannot be dry. Same with the river coming from New Gloucester. Not dry at Cunningham's in the Intervale.

0

TheDanMonster t1_j5cbv2h wrote

That’s not how artisan wells work. And drawing from running waterways for domestic and agriculture use is not legal.

Check out the states waterwell mgs database online if you want to check whether it’s comparatively “dry” or not.

0

IamSauerKraut t1_j5ch3vt wrote

North Yarmouth has no true artesian wells. As Mr. Ryerson told us all those years ago: a pumped well is not artesian.

Nevertheless, a working streambed and soggy areas suggest the water table is relatively high. I highly doubt North Yarmouth is "bone dry" as you claim.

0