Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.theresin t1_j7hfet5 wrote
Reply to comment by 11feetWestofEast in Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios. by busback
BNAS would still be useful in an all-out scenario, because you know damn well the government would take it back over if they had to (all the facilities are still there, as is the long runway).
But barring that, a lot of BIW's infrastructure and work-force are located from Brunswick to Wiscasset so ... might as well be thorough.
hike_me t1_j7lg1hy wrote
It takes years to build and launch a ship. BIW is basically irrelevant in total nuclear war
It’s only on the 2000 warhead scenario because they’re probably running out of strategically important things to nuke at that point
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments