Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

reptarcannabis t1_j8v3nk3 wrote

How do I make money off this ? Gas mask sales ? Asking for a friend

−16

diaryofsnow t1_j8v3xez wrote

I have no idea how to interpret what I'm reading here

4

Inevitable_Raccoon50 t1_j8v46k2 wrote

The date looks like from the 8th of February. It seems to have already passed

43

k_mainer t1_j8w2g06 wrote

Plastic sheeting and duct tape/flex tape? I read that in the event of toxic air you shut off anything in your home with indoor/outdoor air exchange and seal your windows/doors with plastic and tape.

4

Natprk t1_j8w4u2m wrote

You think this is bad? Check out the nuclear fallout projection maps. Going up to camp during a nuclear war isn’t going to save your @$$.

9

UncleRicosWig t1_j8w8ufg wrote

I think this was released based on the winds right after the fire began. The winds shifted pretty quickly after. I think the fall out was more South east

0

Sophistrysapien247 t1_j8w90zd wrote

I think it's still hard to say if we breathed in a lot of this or not. It's floating higher up as it gets closer to us, moving fast and diluting.

It's not good at all but I don't think we should panick compared to what we are breathing in on a daily basis

27

SobeysBags t1_j8wdugj wrote

Damn , hope Canada is sending Ohio a bill .

1

rectumlike t1_j8whzf4 wrote

Maine historically get its pollution from the Ohio rust-belt area. I can remember in the 80s all the acid rain.

19

ppitm t1_j8wixg7 wrote

Fallout projection maps are mostly BS based on silly assumptions that all the bombs go off on the ground.

You will be just fine up at camp until you starve to death.

8

Sophistrysapien247 t1_j8y8ee5 wrote

It already passed us for one. And secondly I never said we weren't breathing it in.

I suggested that the amount we actually inhale is unknown and isn't going to be the same concentration as the site of the contamination. Meaning, I don't think we should worry just uet because we aren't breathing in much more chemicals than a normal day

0

20thMaine t1_j8yayv2 wrote

Same deal with the nuclear winter hypothesis. It probably overestimated how much vaporized wood (from wildfires in forests surrounding cities) would get shot into the atmosphere

5

ppitm t1_j8yeblz wrote

Although as I understand it a more conservative assumption is that a springtime war could still plausibly result in a sudden cold snap that kills many of the crops in the northern hemisphere, drastically worsening global starvation.

5

Notmystationbro t1_j8zcrrn wrote

EPA should be ashamed of themselves. Evacuate the city NOW. You know it’s bad when the wildlife has fled

1

MosskeepForest t1_j90bocg wrote

The government said the "dirty rain" was just dust. Would the government lie? (haha)

0

MosskeepForest t1_j90c89i wrote

That's the fun part of American environmental safety reporting... it usually comes in the form of "surprise! you were poisoned a while ago!!" haha.

So many of these things aren't going to kill you straight out, instead you just get spikes in cancer rates in towns for decades and government / companies insisting "that could be from anything" (if people ever question it).

0

blutigetranen t1_j959xw4 wrote

Passing a ppm check doesn't mean the carcinogen that you're breathing is safe. Have you seen the pictures of vehicles in Maine with the brown rain drops on them shortly after the fire occurred. Breathing or breathed, it's an avoidable situation where we were forced to inhale toxic carcinogens and chemical fumes.

2