Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

LASERman71 t1_iyc903z wrote

  1. I would love to get rid of wrist rest.
  2. I would love to have good low profile switch but nearly all are awful to type on after you get accustomed to fine tuned enthusiast full size MX style switch.
  3. Keychron made more variations beyond red/brown/blue but they optical and only fit their LP keebs AFAIK.
  4. NuPhy Air75 with their nSA keycaps is the best I've tried so far but I am still jumping back and forth to my custom build with perfected typing experience.
  5. Hopefully LP market will expand and customisation, switch and keycaps options will follow.
4

Klaster_1 t1_iyc6ze6 wrote

Went from a K63 to an Air75, the most notable difference was a different layout, no complaints otherwise.

3

QWERKey-UK t1_iybxo2g wrote

I'm not fan. Every time I try one, it feels like I'm typing on a laptop.

2

kool-keys t1_iycjo5s wrote

It's all a personal preference. I personally like a higher, more standard profile, but if you are used to a lower profile board, then it may be a good option. Try a standard profile board and see how you feel about it.

1

IAlwaysReplyLate t1_iycsc35 wrote

I hope low-profile will stay around and hopefully get better - but the situation at the moment isn't inspiring. Virtually no interchangeability is the big problem here, so instead of the competitive development we see in MX we have several manufacturers all trying to protect their own IP.

Couple that with the inherent difficulty in getting short-travel switches to feel good, the years of development time low-profile is behind standard-profile, and the involvement of the big keyboard manufacturers with their interest in an unchanging pinout and cap mount, and the picture isn't bright. If some manufacturers would get together and co-develop a switch, pooling the royalties, things might improve. But it doesn't seem likely at the moment.

The big prize for us enthusiasts would be a switch fully compatible (in footprint anyway) with standard MX. Then we might get more widespread take-up of low-profile, when it's easy to just swap in LP switches to try. There's probably a technical reason why someone hasn't done it already... but these problems are there to be solved ;)

This will all be sorted out in 20 years or so when the patents run out. But the question is whether any low-profile switch (apart from ML) will survive that long... we could end up in a Romer-G situation, where the bad name gained by the early attempts hinders take-up of the later versions.

1