Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Thwop t1_j2bmrty wrote

Reply to comment by AcostaJA in After waiting for 2 months, it finally arrived, the M0110 reproduced by RyeWorks by Informal-Mirror-4751

what makes you think that this won't work on a Mac?

3

AcostaJA t1_j2c2ukl wrote

It likely will work, but a mess

−4

Informal-Mirror-4751 OP t1_j2ccdkt wrote

>It likely will work, but a mess

Depending on your input habits, if 60% keyboards are useless, wouldn’t 40% of keyboard users be unable to surf the Internet at all?

4

AcostaJA t1_j2dfwiv wrote

There are optimal solutions, a 40-60% has a niche among MacBook users (given F-keys aren't often used), but not for desktop Mac, there are N better mechanical keyboards that doesn't compromise productivity or condition user to rely on keys combinations.

IMHO this keyboard lies closer to fetishism than actual ergonomics .

−1

Informal-Mirror-4751 OP t1_j2dqwxj wrote

As a keyboard that pays tribute to the classic design of the 1980s, you have to bind it with the rules of 2022. Do you think what you said is reasonable? Should the antique books used for decoration be burned because they are not easy to read and retrieve?

1

Thwop t1_j2ce46v wrote

again unsure of why you think this. you can program these keyboards any way you want.

2

AcostaJA t1_j2dgb55 wrote

There are much better mechanical Mac keyboards, this is just fetishism vs actually ergonomics/usability. It maybe less harmful on MacBook than desktop where a TKL o 60% won't forced you into key combinations, I use my Mac mostly to code I have an TKL Ctrl keyboard even with custom firmware, this is simple irrational.

−2