Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Puzzleheaded_Bit9469 t1_jaeb0bt wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in How many of you would agree with me on The Beatles being overrated by drums-please-fab-

Number one song on Billboard in 1964 doesn’t count then? Okey doke 🫤

5

[deleted] t1_jaec599 wrote

[deleted]

1

Puzzleheaded_Bit9469 t1_jaecyh6 wrote

So we’re now going by critically acclaimed, ok. I feel like Lucy’s moving the football on me. List their critically acclaimed songs. Now list all from the artists you mentioned. Multiply those songs by two. You probably come up with the same amount of songs from Revolver.

3

Because_I_Cannot t1_jaedl43 wrote

>I feel like Lucy’s moving the football on me.

haha, I was about to tell OP that he's talking in circles. I think he's just being contrarian at this point

3

DaftPump t1_jaee6y0 wrote

Don't waste your time. OP thinks the Beatles are over-rated. Big deal.

2

Because_I_Cannot t1_jaeecl4 wrote

WTF are you even talking about at this point? Man, when your high wears off I hope you just delete this nonsense.

First of all, you HAVE to compare bands against their time period. And when you do, The Beatles absolutely come out on top, even 20 years after their last record. Take a look at this. It's a Wikipedia page, but it links to a book COMPILED BY CRITICS. In 1978, The Beatles held 4 of the top 10 spots on "Top 200 Albums" By 1987, they still had 3 of those spots.

3

Because_I_Cannot t1_jaeh2lb wrote

If you think a music critic today is going to say that The Beatles are overrated, you're flat-out wrong. They're going to say what most of us are saying, which is that they are one of the most influential bands of all time

2