Submitted by drums-please-fab- t3_11eia44 in Music
[deleted] t1_jaec599 wrote
Reply to comment by Puzzleheaded_Bit9469 in How many of you would agree with me on The Beatles being overrated by drums-please-fab-
[deleted]
Puzzleheaded_Bit9469 t1_jaecyh6 wrote
So we’re now going by critically acclaimed, ok. I feel like Lucy’s moving the football on me. List their critically acclaimed songs. Now list all from the artists you mentioned. Multiply those songs by two. You probably come up with the same amount of songs from Revolver.
Because_I_Cannot t1_jaedl43 wrote
>I feel like Lucy’s moving the football on me.
haha, I was about to tell OP that he's talking in circles. I think he's just being contrarian at this point
DaftPump t1_jaee6y0 wrote
Don't waste your time. OP thinks the Beatles are over-rated. Big deal.
Because_I_Cannot t1_jaeecl4 wrote
WTF are you even talking about at this point? Man, when your high wears off I hope you just delete this nonsense.
First of all, you HAVE to compare bands against their time period. And when you do, The Beatles absolutely come out on top, even 20 years after their last record. Take a look at this. It's a Wikipedia page, but it links to a book COMPILED BY CRITICS. In 1978, The Beatles held 4 of the top 10 spots on "Top 200 Albums" By 1987, they still had 3 of those spots.
Because_I_Cannot t1_jaeh2lb wrote
If you think a music critic today is going to say that The Beatles are overrated, you're flat-out wrong. They're going to say what most of us are saying, which is that they are one of the most influential bands of all time
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments