Apostate_Nate t1_iy7geia wrote
Reply to comment by Fluffy_Little_Fox in Bands that never changed vocalists by IR-Master
Sorta? And honestly I think they did the right thing by not using the old name, since it wasn't the same band anymore. At the same time I can understand not wanting to lose name recognition for the work already done. It's an odd and unfortunate question to contemplate.
Fluffy_Little_Fox t1_iy7gpsb wrote
And then you have a murky situation such as ELO vs ELO Part 2.
"""In 1988 drummer Bev Bevan approached Jeff Lynne, wanting to record another ELO album.[2] Lynne declined to participate, so Bevan signaled that he intended to continue the band without him.[3] Lynne, however, objected over use of the ELO name, and the final agreement reached between the two resulted in ELO officially disbanding and Bevan forming a new band in 1989 called Electric Light Orchestra Part Two.[4] Another term of the agreement was that Lynne would get a percentage of ELO Part II's record royalties.""
Apostate_Nate t1_iy7k5zc wrote
Sure, but then you also have to mention stuff like K.K.s Priest instead of just plain old Judas Priest, and other similar examples. Where does one draw the line?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments