Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Nwk_NJ t1_jaedvfu wrote

Reply to comment by sutisuc in Shaq II is ICONIQ 777 by felsonj

LoL ok. So they can put the incinerator in Kearny or Rahway next time. That way the invisible Newark Borders will stop the smog...of course it may raise prices in the ironbound!

They did get rid of their in-city incinerator though...so I'm Surprised the prices didn't sky rocket!

https://hiddencityphila.org/2018/03/back-when-we-burned-trash-on-the-delaware-river/

1

sutisuc t1_jaee65b wrote

I don’t understand you think it’s a bad thing for a city to get rid of an incinerator? This is a weird reflexive “my team vs your team” thing that I don’t get. You want to live in a city with more pollution or less? Philly should be commended for getting rid of that. I hope we do the same in Newark some day. Philly being cheaper and having less pollution than Newark is not the win for Newark you seem to think it is.

0

Nwk_NJ t1_jaeeisn wrote

LoL you are one of those ppl that can't take an L and just keeps talking. We aren't talking about getting rid of incinerators. I'm in the middle of eviscerating your absurd assertion that Philly had less of a pollution/superfund/incineration problem than Newark.

I was also cracking a joke...since you hate rising prices and don't acknowledge that improvments lead to price increases...i.e., get rid of the incinerator, awesome...but then you'd complain about a house selling for more. You seem like you just want to have your cake and eat it to is what I'm getting....its not realistic.

1

[deleted] t1_jaeesxo wrote

[deleted]

1

sutisuc t1_jaefxvn wrote

I’m talking about present day. Why would you think it matters if a city used to have one? Newark presently has one and many other active polluters. What’s hard to grasp about that.

Regarding your edit can we get some environmental remediation like Philly got in that case to go along with the price increase? I don’t consider studios going for 2500 being a benefit.

1